Operational diagrams should be kept simple, avoiding complex intersections of wires and cables. Is this statement true or false?

The statement that operational diagrams should be kept simple, avoiding complex intersections of wires and cables, is best understood within the context of what operational diagrams are intended to represent. Operational diagrams serve to convey the functional relationships and connections among various components in a system, and while simplicity can enhance clarity, there are situations where complexity naturally occurs due to the system's design.

In many engineering scenarios, particularly in larger or more complex systems, the interactions and connections may indeed require a more intricate representation to accurately depict how components interface with one another. Over-simplifying these connections can lead to significant misunderstandings or misrepresentations of how a system operates, which is crucial for effective operation, troubleshooting, and maintenance.

Therefore, it isn't strictly true that operational diagrams should always be kept simple to avoid complex intersections. The accurate representation of a system may necessitate a certain level of complexity that reflects real-life configurations and interconnections, thereby making the statement false.